but if williams would have held on to both balls SF would have won it and if the Giants had played the best they could they would have not needed to profit of those two mistakes
If wishes were horses then beggars might ride. It is another one of those cases of would've, could've, should've . . . but didn't.
Williams dropped his balls and the G-men capitalized on the mistakes. That is the essence of football, the ability to convert turnovers into points on the board. If you want to win you play both to your own strengths and to the opponents' weaknesses.
Look at the Pats vs the Crows in the AFC game . . . the Crows all but shut down the Brady offense and still lost because the Pats played on Baltimore's weakness. Baltimore came prepared to defend against an air attack and got beaten on the ground because they didn't dare slack off on the pass defence. That and the Pats' much-disrespected defence played at an all-Pro level.
In the SF game the Giants got as many points as they needed and stayed healthy for the Superbowl. It was one of those games that might have gone either way but SF is just rising up from years in the cellar and they didn't have the poise that comes from experience in winning big games. Maybe they'll do better next year.
Both conference title games were excellent and both winning teams deserve their wins.
All hail the New York Giants!