Speaking of the show did you guys see the episode where the girl who was suppose to be a 2nd date for one of the fellas ending up leaving the show because she couldn't stand to be naked with other naked people. Seriously did she think this out before auditioning?
What if she just wanted to try it because she thought it'd be fun and exciting, and she's an outgoing person who likes trying new things, and then it turned out it wasn't her kind of thing so she stopped, like any sensible person would?
So she went on a dating reality show and the guy was already dating stopped calling because of the show. lol
I'm sticking to my opinion of her. Just think guys, she's single now.
You do know that there is a time gap between recording a show and broadcasting a show, right? I'd have thought the sequence of events went something like this: Month 1 - films episode. Month 2, starts dating guy. Month 3, episode broadcast, guy sees her on the show and can't handle it.
I genuinely don't get how we can be here saying that we don't think there's anything wrong with being naked on one hand, and on the other basically stopping only just short of calling a young woman a slut for doing something naked, just because it's in a different situation to the hundreds of situations when
we'd be naked. It's absurd and nonsensical. Of all the people who should be most aware of why it's a bad idea to just pass out judgement based on one's own limited and relative experience, I thought it would be, well, us.
I'll say it again. You do not know this person. You don't know her motivations for going on this show: you don't know whether it was just for fun, on a dare, because she needed the money, just to experience something new, for the fame, or because she thought it might help her modelling career (similar to 'for the fame', but the underlying motivation's a bit different). You have no idea whether she's a lovely person who's made a mistake, an attention-seeker, or a naive and gullible person who's been exploited, and you have no idea why she's very concerned about the boundary between being shown naked but censored, and naked and uncensored, so you're in no position to decide whether or not her reasoning for drawing that boundary is reasonable.
BUT you're still perfectly happy to assume all the worst (for your own personal value of worst) options about her because it conforms to the mental picture you've built up in your head before you started actually thinking about it. It's depressingly stupid - you'd be complaining about exactly the same thing if you told someone you were a naturist and they assumed that meant you were a sex-crazed pervert.