Author [EN] [PL] [ES] [PT] [IT] [DE] [FR] [NL] [TR] [SR] [AR] [RU] Topic: People Called These Photos Of An Artist's Daughter 'Pornographic.'  (Read 1007 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline NakedShadow

  • N Forum Veteran
  • Shouting it out loud
  • *****
  • Posts: 969
  • Country: us
  • Location: United States
  • Total likes: 125
  • Gender: Male
  • Age: 27
  • Vivre Sa Vie
  • Referrals: 0
Re: People Called These Photos Of An Artist's Daughter 'Pornographic.'
« Reply #15 on: November 07, 2021, 07:13:54 am »
I don't see his photos as pornographic but parents should know what is best for their children, evident here as even nudity positive members here won't go this far for their children.
I do love the photographer's exhibit name: "I FEEL SORRY FOR YOUR CHILDREN –- The Sexualization of Innocence in America"

Pornography is in the mind of the viewer and should have no bearing on the subject.  Unless were talking explicit sex acts.  Some people will find anything pornographic and there is no end to what they might demand be restricted based on their own nonsense.  They can prove harm or they can stfu as far as I'm concerned.

To be fair I know this forum tends to like to jump on the "nudity is good" train but we truly can't know the real intentions of the photographer. There's still definite repercussions for this kind of thing. I mean chances are it's fine but I'm not gonna immediately jump on the "negative" comments because they have some merit because like I said there's always details left out especially in journalism. My point being I don't think 90% of these are as one sided as "prudes bad nudity good".

I get your point, but in this case the photographer is her dad while they're on a trip. The photos look like normal things kids do. The worst photo is probably just the one where she's nude in the middle of the road on all fours cause what's the point.

lol this statement proved itself to come true before our eyes
don't google foot fetish