Naturist Resources > Blogs, Videos, Articles about Naturism/Nudity

People Called These Photos Of An Artist's Daughter 'Pornographic.'

<< < (2/4) > >>

Fishandchips:

--- Quote from: JustARando on October 21, 2021, 12:27:57 am ---
--- Quote from: Redfrigginriot on October 20, 2021, 05:48:31 pm ---To be fair I know this forum tends to like to jump on the "nudity is good" train but we truly can't know the real intentions of the photographer. There's still definite repercussions for this kind of thing. I mean chances are it's fine but I'm not gonna immediately jump on the "negative" comments because they have some merit because like I said there's always details left out especially in journalism. My point being I don't think 90% of these are as one sided as "prudes bad nudity good".

--- End quote ---

I get your point, but in this case the photographer is her dad while they're on a trip. The photos look like normal things kids do. The worst photo is probably just the one where she's nude in the middle of the road on all fours cause what's the point.

--- End quote ---

Yeah I thought about that but couldn’t tell if it was just the low resolution of the image posted or if it was actually faked and the girl was pasted into a picture of a road. But like you say, what’s the point. Some of his pictures do seem like they were deliberately set up to create shock among the public but most seem like normal kid things. That’s just my opinion from glancing though. 🤷‍♂️

nacktfuchs:

--- Quote from: Longingtobenude on October 20, 2021, 07:07:02 pm ---Pornography is in the mind of the viewer and should have no bearing on the subject.  Unless were talking explicit sex acts.  Some people will find anything pornographic and there is no end to what they might demand be restricted based on their own nonsense.  They can prove harm or they can stfu as far as I'm concerned.

--- End quote ---

agree with you

eagleday:

--- Quote from: Redfrigginriot on October 20, 2021, 05:48:31 pm ---To be fair I know this forum tends to like to jump on the "nudity is good" train but we truly can't know the real intentions of the photographer. There's still definite repercussions for this kind of thing. I mean chances are it's fine but I'm not gonna immediately jump on the "negative" comments because they have some merit because like I said there's always details left out especially in journalism. My point being I don't think 90% of these are as one sided as "prudes bad nudity good".

--- End quote ---

As a father myself, I'd be very cautious to publish my child's photos.

DaniSnow:
i looked at the article and the pictures, have people gone insane????
these are porngrafic pictures???
if this is pornographic then we need to abolish all family albums that are out there on the web.
maybe we also need new rules about taking pictures of kids, "no pants, no shirt, no shoes = no picture"
and we wonder why naturism is dying in the world....

Interested Nudist:
These photos really don't constitute porn. There's not anything wrong with his photos. just shows the innocence of childhood. if anything, people who see this as porn just have something wrong with them.

that being said, if I was in his place I would be more wary of publishing such photos online. obviously there's nothing perverse about it, but you never know how she would feel about the photos when she grows up. it's like equivalent of your parents posting your bath photos as a kid online. needless to say, most people would be pretty embarrassed by it later on.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page